DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
704 S. COURTHOUS
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
substantially co comments contained in the
advisory opinion cy
008-13 dated 26 wt
program “incentive lun 5 KCeN
prescribed sea t e
Board further agreec cy
discretionary pay d individual
pay after the Se cary @F ises tl
Docket No. NR5428-14
requesting to extend on
Request (1306/7) on 1 November 2012,
y Squadron TWO (MSRON TWO)
board Maritime Expeditionary Securit
without asking for the Special Duty Incentive Pay.
Under these circumstances the Board found that no relief is
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names aud vuies of the members cf the panel will be furnished
upon request.
that the circumstances of your case are such
You are entitled to nave
ubmission of new
f the Board's decision.
the Board
It is regretted
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon §
evidence within one year from the dare 0
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT oJ.
O' NELTLL
Pear sae - ~ = ae ee
Bxmecutive DLreccor
Enclosure: DINO memo “L200 6
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07773-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400 MMPR 2 of 17 October 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09296-08
You also impliedly requested reconsideration of your previous request to adjust your gunnery sergeant (pay grade E-7) date of rank and effective date to reflect selection by the Calendar Year (CY) 2001 or 2002 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, rather than CY 2003. While the Board did consider your having been selected for promotion to master sergeant the first time you were considered with a corrected record to be new and material evidence in support of backdating your promotion to gunnery...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06
In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03723-01
has requested to have his date of rank selected by the CY 1997 Gunnery considered in zone for contends that the reason he was Gunnery Sergeant wh as considered and not selected for 8 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Boards. Gunnery Sergeant promotion by CY 1997 The specific reason(s) why he was not selected by either of these two Many high quality Marines are not selected boards is not known. upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05021-08
18 Sep 08 5021-08 Dear: This is in reference to your ap pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. record A three-membb sitting in September 2 in accordante with administrative regula applicable considered Cy the Board consisted of your application, plication for correction of your naval er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, xecutive session, considered your application on 18 08. khe advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo lul and conscientious consideration of the en ound...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06715-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the Marines selected for promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07373-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board's file on your prior case (docket number 3061-04), your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08296-01
This is supported by your having been selected by the CY 2001 promotion board, which considered you before the MCTFS had been corrected. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. BRIAN J. GEORGE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775 .2 q r/L 3 IN REPLY REFER TO 107 0 JAM2A MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10418-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to gunnery sergeant (pay grade E-7) from 1 July 1994 to 1 July 1993; and changing the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to master sergeant (pay grade E-8) from 1 April 2001 to 1 April 2000, to reflect...